Friday, November 8, 2013

HR's time for reflection

Lately I've been very cerebral. Stuck in my thoughts for hours. In fact, as a recruiter you move so fast and speak with so many people - that you very rarely get those moments of deep reflection. It's also that time of year when HR gets a tad hairy. We have open enrollment, budgeting, workforce planning and it's also Q4! The business is trying to finish off strong, but it is HR's time for measuring and planning. Naturally I am knee deep!

I don't know about you, but all this planning requires some deep reflection. Thinking about what worked, what didn't... what improvements are needed? What does next year look like and how will we drive those results? What resources are needed and what resources have had a low ROI? Then there is: data, data, data. Hopefully you have the data to substantiate your opinions and decisions - right? Well, for front line recruiters... maybe not as much. They just know what they know... because they experience it first hand.  However, if you are going to make a business case... data sure would be the icing on the cake now wouldn't it!?

Frankly, my head is spinning with all of these thoughts and ideas!


The thing that I've been pondering most is Branding.... it's a hot topic and has been for years. It affects the recruiter and hr practitioners world in so many ways. If I were to take a holistic look at my day-to-day; the employment brand impacts my ability to recruit, retain and engage the workforce. Sure I could be pondering big data... I could be pondering better engagement strategies (which I think is next on the list), but I keep coming back to branding. I think because to me.... it's foundational. It's grass roots. I've also realized how easily social media gets confused as branding; instead of the vehicle for branding. So, I set out to get a refresher on employment branding and found myself with a plethora of content out there. Sweet!

Some shout outs:

Great post this week in Talent Management Magazine

LinkedIn's - State of Employer Branding

Wise Branding Advice: Your Employment Brand must be genuine!!!
If you brand the company and then can't get your organization to live up to the brand.... essentially it is false advertising. Let me tell you... people do not take kindly to that sort of thing!

Have you come across any good content or stats on employment branding?
Please respond and share..

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Chemistry

"A band's only unique thing is its chemistry, especially if none of you are prodigious players or particularly handsome. The one thing you have is your uniqueness, so we hold on to that." 
- Chris Martin

I think the same applies to partnerships, teams and cultures... the chemistry is an integral part of how smooth, innovative and results oriented the operation can be. Chemistry is a hard thing to fake and not necessarily about similarities. I love witnessing scenarios where two opposite people create this scale-like dynamic between them. A bountiful balance of give and take, yin and yang, push and pull.... bouncing ideas off of one another, finishing each others sentences and each spoken thought builds upon the next in a fusion.

Ok, so maybe I got a bit poetic there... (guilty)

I have witnessed this and it's a total breath of fresh air. Even better when YOU find someone and experience that kind of chemistry first hand... knowing that this could be fate?! Maybe?

My really good friend Maambeamba Arthur-Price (she doesn't mind me shamelessly plugging her awesomeness) and I have that kind of chemistry. We finish each others sentences, highly respect the opinion of the other... we are honest with each other knowing that it only makes us both better. I had the pleasure of finding her, recruiting her.... closing her (which was a fete) and working with her. Since then, I have learned so much about myself and wonder if it wasn't fate to find someone like this to bring professional balance to my life. I have learned from her, she has learned from me...I would not be who I am today if this did not happen. Do not confuse this with mentor... not the same thing. Our chemistry is one of equality, learning and respect.

So, (getting to my point - I promise) when it comes to hiring.... isn't chemistry important? I get the value of behavioral based interviewing. I understand halo-effect and competence... but having interviewed for a job yourself (yes, you reader) have you had the moment when you questioned the chemistry of the team or your chemistry with the manager?

Will this work? Can I work for this person? Will I learn from this person? Will he/she make me better or hold me back from my true potential?

I think it's important and I know "I" wouldn't accept a job unless the chemistry was there and I felt I could learn from (the leader, the team, the challenges) them.

What are your thoughts on chemistry?
Have you witnessed a team or duo who have that  je ne sais quoi?

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

The Art of Rejection: Vital to Candidate Experience

Rejection... unfortunately something we all face at one point or another. It stinks being on the receiving end of it, but in life rejection is a necessary evil.

The reason I picked this topic today, is because of a conversation I had with a job seeker late last week. She said, "I am tired of applying and interviewing for jobs and never getting a call or an email back". I understood where she was coming from....if you took the time to apply, phone interview, take time off to go into their office; the least they could do is communicate their decision. However, being the one who delivers bad news more than good news gives me some ...er....perspective.

I understand that recruiters carry heavy work loads and don't always have the time to get back to everyone. I am not excusing it, because that is not my M.O. I have met recruiters that just don't like sending rejection letters or making that dreaded call. It's not fun. I get that, because I don't enjoy it either. One of the reasons that I love recruiting is giving someone who deserves the job - the job! The thing is, it IS a necessary evil... because it is vital to candidate experience.

So what about other forms of rejection? In Sales? In Sports? In getting picked last? In not getting the promotion? In not getting the guy/girl? We all have to experience this (unfortunately), but what I will leave you with is this... What did you learn from getting rejected? Have you taken the time to ponder that?

I am a firm believer in learning from negative experiences. Maybe you will practice more to make the team? Maybe you will learn to coach instead of play? So, you didn't get the promotion... what did the person have that you didn't? Was it a political decision? Should you develop your skills more in one area or another? Is it time to move on and get the recognition you deserve? You didn't catch that awesome fish in the sea... was it a blessing in disguise? Do you need to spend some time working on yourself?

There are a lot of questions you can be asking yourself when you experience rejection. I am not saying that you should blame yourself or be hard on yourself - that is NOT what you should do. What I am saying is that reflection is important. Understanding your weaknesses is a step forward in self improvement and I am a big advocate for self improvement (I have the braces at 34 to prove it!).

Now as for the Art of Rejection....

You have probably been subjected to the "sandwich methodology" - you know where you get two compliments sandwiched between the negative feedback (or in this case rejection). In HR, we tread lightly when giving feedback (if at all), because it mitigates risk. People misinterpret what you say sometimes, twisting kind feedback and turning it into a discriminatory remark. As such, a recruiter will never tell you exactly why you didn't get the job (or at least they shouldn't). Where the "art" comes in is... crafting a rejection that is not ego destroying.

For example: "Thank you for all the time you invested in our interview process. While your background was most impressive, we have decided to hire someone who better fit the requirements of the positions. We hope that we will cross paths again in the future. Best of luck in your search." Yes, there is a compliment in there, but it's not just a simple sandwich. It is more of a positive let down. This approach will leave a favorable impression of your company and is what the candidate experience friendly rejection should feel like. Positive, open for the future, encouraging respect for their time investment and still promoting the employment brand.

Thoughts?

Friday, September 13, 2013

Starting the Fall Campus Trail

Fall is my favorite season! There is a distinct smell in the air that comes with Fall and what's not to like about hoodie weather, pumpkin spice everything and leaves in every color! The other reason I like Fall is because it's back to school time... not just for my son, but for my candidate pool as well.

This week I've booked my campus travel schedule and mapped out which Sales Managers and Alumni Account Executives will be joining me as I road trip to various campuses across the Midwest. I've also mapped out the next two campus season(s) branding strategies and how we will pipeline for the large ramp of new hires we plan for Q1, Q2 and Q3 of 2014.

I can hardly contain my excitement. For me - I'm in my element on campus, as I love the energy level I get to exude. I often refer to it as hustling, "Everyday I'm Hustling" (Cue LMFAO) haha!

It surprises me how wrong people can be about the Millennial population sometimes. I see this first hand on campus. Sure, there are some entitled kids out there that went to school because mommy and daddy paid for them to go and it was an excuse to get out of the house, join a frat and party. However, I see a great deal of smart go-getters out there that want to make an impact on a company, learn and absorb as much as they can. It is those "go-getters" that are our future! They make a difference and are part of the war on talent from a grow-your-own talent perspective.

The key is having a recruiter that can spot the go-getters and sell the opportunity of making an impact at your organization. Sure branding is a HUGE component, but that is a different post. Weeding out the entitled from the go-getter is not all that hard, but is indeed a learned skill. Some of the things I look for on campus are:
  1. Dressed professional and prepared at the career fair
  2. Mapped out a plan for which employers to speak with, their openings and did some research on the company
  3. Prepared with copies of their resume and pitches for why they are a candidate that should be considered
  4. Activities, Philanthropy, Student Government, Internships, Sports, Collegiate Activities/Groups on their resume that showcase that this person is INVOLVED and used to juggling responsibility
  5. Energy level and willingness to introduce themselves (you would be surprised how often this is missed)
  6. BONUS: Prior to fair, emailed resume or applied online and mentions they will visit your booth (I love this one - extra points!)
Some of the red flags?
  1. Sloppy appearance
  2. Not prepared
  3. Crumpled resumes
  4. No research, no map, no plan, no clue
  5. Busy socializing with their friends and not actually engaging employers
  6. Resume with only school and summer jobs
  7. Low energy level (I am not talking introvert here - but literally like they had an all night keger the night before and decided to show up anyway)
  8. No real clue as to what types of jobs they are targeting
  9. Just hitting the booths for free swag or chotchkies
So... with that said, my campus season starts next week. The chotchkies are ordered and packed in my trunk with my booth, business cards, flyers and maps! They will remain in my trunk until end of November. Now let's just hope no one rear-ends me and we have yet again another stellar recruiting season!!!!

Saturday, September 7, 2013

If data is not important...then I dont know what is!

Does anyone out there still keep manual spreadsheets? (My hand is raised btw)

Data is so important.. I know this, you know this and everyone else across the globe knows this. However, myself and a bunch of my corporate recruiting friends all have the same complaints - reporting!!! Now maybe it is because the group of people I know work at companies that have not made applicant tracking system reporting a priority or maybe there are more people out there with these same issues than I personally know?

In terms of fortune 500 level companies or companies with employees under 2500 (which I am most familiar with) they do not invest is systems that I drool over like Success Factors or Kenexa. We typically have Taleo business edition, PC Recruiter, Virtual Edge and even icims. What is frustrating is that a lot of  these ATS systems are not designed the same as the actual recruiters workflow. Maybe even the person who implemented the system didn't understand the workflow (which is more likely the culprit). Therefore, the data is not recorded in the same fashion. Most of the systems are customizable (which is one of the reasons it was purchased in the first place) but there are a ton of add-on costs in order to configure dashboard reporting. Instead of getting fancy dashboard reports that executives want to see (let's be honest we want to also see), you get raw data that you dump into Excel.

Mind-numbing raw, stinking-freaking RAW data. So, then you have to manipulate it to make it fancy but that is a lot of bloody mindless work.... when surely a system can do that, right?! 

I've been fortunate enough to see the before and after of what good HRIS consulting can do to configure Taleo. It still wasn't perfect, but you know your reports are only as good as the tracking of data in the system so...  Plus, improvement is good - perfection is unrealistic.

Any commiserate-rs? Any braggarts that want to share their awesome reporting (I am guaranteed to be jealous)?

Thursday, September 5, 2013

The Politics for Making a Business Case

Corporate politics can be tricky. It can be even more tricky when you are driving change (or at least trying to). I realize we are not all in a position to be change agents, but your engaged employees should be trying to drive change... at the very least from a process improvement point of view.

With that said - being a change agent is one thing, but actually getting the buy-in from the business to implement change... is an entirely different mountain. Yes it is a MOUNTAIN! Corporate politics make it a mountain. There is red tape, personal agendas, egos, higher salaries, and even a dictatorship in some cases. Wow, that's enough to make anyone give up on their idea...even when it is for the good of an organization!

So, how would one go about making the business case for change (if they were brave enough to try)? A good friend and colleague (who is a sales professional) shared with me a story that sticks with me to this very day. He said, "I always go 80% there and let the decision makers fill in the other 20%. Works every time!". Having seen him put this into action, I am convinced his methods produce results. However, we can't all be a brave political warrior like him, so I have outlined a pretty good checklist to help you get there.

1.) Understand the problem. This may make you go back to your college research paper days to write out a problem statement. However, you also need raw data to prove that it actually is a problem. Do you have metrics that showcase the problem in a quantitative way? If so, you might want to include those.

2.) How does this affect the business? What is the current state under this condition and what is the worst case scenario over time (long-term or short-term) if no change is made?

3.) Understand your audience. Who will be at the table and have influence over the decision for implementing the change you are suggesting? Who is the loudest? Who is the influencer of others? Make a list and organize it by loudest, most opinionated and influential and put the quietest, less influential at the bottom.

4.) Fully scope out your solution. Will this be a project or an easy 1-off solution? If it is a project, then you need to map out timelines, human capital resources, costs and expected challenges along the way. Nothing looks worst then not having the answers. So, reverse engineer the meeting. Think of all the things they might ask you and have the answers researched and ready!

5.) Target the loudest most influential decision makers. Pick the top two and have a pre-close/buy-in conversation off on the side. Having two influential people already on your side, makes it easier to get the rest of them into group-think mode. Address the problem at hand and give them 80% of your solution. Back them into telling you the other 20% of the solution (that you already know). This gives them personal ownership in your business case. Be careful and tread lightly; you don't want both influencers thinking they own the same idea. Also, think of this as a trial run.

6.) Present your business case to the group and make sure your problem statement, solution, and project plan are well formed and organized in a nice power point. Be sure to give credit where credit is due, by verbally recognizing the 2 influential decision makers. Let them speak up and also sell your business case. Try your best not to leave the room without getting a confirmation on next steps, what additional information they need or in a best case scenario - an answer!

Overall this is a very collaborative approach, but it gets the job done. Just know that it takes an army to successfully implement change, even when it's a no-brainer to you and will save the company money, time or resources. Change is not something that the majority of people take on easily.

What strategies have you used to make a business case and skate through corporate politics?

Now get your brave-politico-warrior game face on .... Grrrr!

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

The Job Hopper

Countless times this has been the road block for many talented individuals. Frankly, I've always wondered if this is a blessing or a curse. You are probably thinking... Blessing? How can she define it as such? Well the reality is you would have had to be hired for several jobs in order to be defined as a job hopper and that means you were chosen by the employer and embraced as part of their team. They saw potential and had hope in you. The fact is, there are many people out there that are not as interview savvy and did not get that frequent of opportunity to join. Isn't that sort of a blessing to have that type of skill? You also have to wonder if that skill translates to the important skills needed in this job!

Yeah, yeah US employers don't want to invest in a person's training and ramp to productivity, only to have to restart that process a year later. However, I have to wonder if they are leaving for a reason and don't actually have the intention of being a job hopper, but are instead being held back from their ambition, micro-managed to death, or avoided a lay-off (jumped ship).

So, how long is long enough? Say you were under the circumstances above, would you stay for the sake of longevity on your resume? A lot of people would... in fact I've heard that before so many times, "I at least have to hit the (#) mark before I consider leaving... I don't want to be perceived as a job hopper".

Don't get me wrong, I don't pick sides on this debate. I just think it is food for thought. So many employers disqualify a candidate based on resume alone because the candidate is perceived as a job hopper, but the reality is if you don't know their situation... how can you truly classify them as such and maybe, just maybe this person just had some bad luck?! The employer should use precaution for sure, but a flat out no seems rigid to me.

Maybe what we should be delving into is why they have made such poor employment decisions repeatedly and make them think hard about what they liked, didn't like and how your environment, managerial style and culture fit affect them in the role? Do they want the same things you are providing? Do their behaviors in past situations point to favorable future circumstances with you? AND... most importantly - Can you keep them?

Some risks are worth taking.... but you should also take the right precaution. Balance is key.

What sort of feelings do you have on the job hopper topic? Ever interviewed and hired someone who shocked you because they made the cut long-term?

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Get Out of the SME's Way! (for your own good)

We often talk about Quality of Hire and I agree that is an important thing. However, what about when you hire a quality person but YOU (the Manager or Leader) are in fact the actual road block to their results? We've also heard the saying "Get out of your own way" but what if that is not the case? What if it is your boss that's in the way?

In this employment market (aka War on Talent), the talented professionals out there have choices, networks of people who will vouch for their super-stardom and they are not held to the same standards as the yet-to-be-determined talent. Therefore, finding them is difficult, retaining them is key and more importantly letting them drive is essential.

In a recent conversation with a new found professional acquaintance we discussed this very topic: Hiring a subject matter expert but then under-utilizing them. He said, "My owner has said flat out that he hires people smarter than him and then gets out of their way"! I echo that statement. If you are a leader hiring talent - you want a subject matter expert. If once you've hired this SME and you still feel the need to micro-manage and control their work, then there is a bigger systemic issue.

So, for all you hiring managers who are hiring subject matter experts to push your business forward...

My advice is this:

In the interview and decision process ask your self
  1. If I had to take a medical leave and be out of pocket - would I trust this person to handle the responsibilities of the role successfully? 
  2. Would I trust them to make quality decisions? 
  3. Would I trust them to make me look good to my peers? 
  4. Would they be able to push the agenda forward (results, project, resources or whatever)?
If your answers are at least 95% yes - then hire them and GET OUT OF THE WAY!
If your answers are not at least 95% yes - then DON'T HIRE THEM - keep looking!

It sounds easy doesn't it? However, we get caught up in a lot of different things like the length of time to fill the position or the competitiveness of the market and we become very reactive and we essentially do not hire the SME we can trust. Now that is a whole other blog topic!

What are your thoughts on the above? Have you experienced or witnessed this very thing? I have and it can be a costly vicious cycle that is counter-productive to moving your business forward.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Poaching Don'ts (ok... just the basics)

Ok, maybe I am venting here out of frustration...  In the last several months I have received several InMails on LinkedIn about various opportunities; while it is always nice to receive one (if only to know your value in the marketplace) it can back-fire and totally turn the candidate off!

The thing is... if you are a recruiter, head-hunter, sourcer or a hiring manager it would be a total waste of time for you to do a simple keyword search, select all on your results and send out an email. In fact, not only is it a waste of time, but it can hinder your credibility as a recruiter. In this instance: poaching a candidate from a competitor.... when done poorly, just makes for office fodder!!

To all the newbie recruiters, sourcers and up-and-coming headhunters:

1.) Do your homework PLEASE! If you poach someone for a job, at least make sure they actually have a background in the job you're poaching them for. Nothing is more off-putting than when you get an inmail for a job in payroll and you are in fact not a payroll professional. (You wouldn't want me in payroll, not a numbers person. Trust me on this!)

2.) Poaching should not be sending an 8 paragraph email, because a 2 paragraph email should suffice. You don't want to waste the person's time before you even know if they are interested and if they have to sift through all the mumbo-jumbo to figure it out.... they most likely will not bother!

3.) It would be wise to summarize the following things:
  • Who you are and your company
  • The position title and key qualifications you are seeking (making sure they match your candidates background)
  • Why the opportunity is exciting (your pitch or elevator speech)
  • Why you are sending them an invite to discuss further
  • Your contact information (beyond just responding through LinkedIn)

4.) Double check your grammar (although we are all guilty of this occasionally), spelling and the actual name of the person - because getting their name right is essential! Let me repeat - get. their. name. right.

I am done venting now...  but I had to "go there" because having 4 instances in 2 months was weird and frankly I was starting to question who was schooling these newbie peeps on poaching!?

The actual inmail that pushed me far enough to blog about it included a wrong spelling of my name, a position I clearly would not be qualified for and never left me with the person's contact information in case I wanted to actually call them back. Just saying...


Friday, August 9, 2013

Culture or Context?

Culture is one of those buzz words that candidates ask about and employers try to articulate, but in my opinion - you really don't fully know the culture until you are breathing it, living it and judging it for yourself.

Sure employers want to identify culture and use or spin it in a positive light for purposes of branding, attraction and retention. Why not use every arsenal possible?? However, the reality is that often times the way an employer describes their culture is not actually how being in the culture is. If you had an opportunity while investigating whether the company was right for you, wouldn't you like to ask several people of different levels how they would describe the culture of the company? Objective people that have no care for whether you get the job or not? The answers vary sometimes and don't always line up....but when they do, that is also something to pay attention to. I've experienced many cultures in my staffing days and then also as an employee for several.

I have defined a few below (but I am sure there are many other definitions my blogger friends have too):

Brainwashed: This is where the employee brand, mission, vision and values are drilled into the minds of all employees (over and over again) in an attempt to have a uniform voice. Makes sense strategically, but what happens when you start the job and you are subjected to said brainwashing only to find yourself in the job 3 months later going...this is well....Bologna!

Severed Voices: This is where there is no real message and no actual work done on defining the culture. When you ask multiple people, you get varying of answers. One says something cliche' like "we work hard, play hard", while another spouts off some canned response like "our culture is one of collaboration and innovation". These are meaningless to a job seeker because they do not actually represent the culture.

Real Transparent: Very rare, but sometimes employers are open enough to allow a candidate to shadow for the day or attend a company event with the hopes of allowing the candidate to define the culture for themselves. This is unique and it takes a level of confidence on the part of the organization to say, "Who am I to define it? Define it for yourself!"

Foundational: This is usually found in organizations that have the money to actually pull off the whole culture branding thing. There is a person in a desk that owns accountability for this and probably a team of deployment peeps as well. From the website, to the office and through on boarding - you see consistency and the culture is representative even when the honeymoon phase  is over. This is a hard fete and some big companies can't get there because their vision and corporate politics clash.

My advise to a candidate is this: Ask the culture question, hear the answers but know that you will never really know the culture until you experience it for yourself. Each person's experience and definition will vary inevitably. Even the company with the best plan for cultural immersion and employment branding still has the office gossip, the negative nancy, the company champion, the canned responder and the blank stare person.

When on the interview - take in your surroundings. Are people smiling? Are people working together? Or are they whispering by the water cooler? When deciding on the offer - visit the companies facebook and social media pages and look at their pictures and posts! Scope out the LinkedIn profiles of their employees and past employees too. If you see a ton of people who came and went - maybe that is a red flag, but maybe it's not. Be careful with sites like Glassdoor.com, because people typically review a company when they are pissed off. Very rarely do people go.... I love my company culture so much I think I will post a review on Glassdoor! What I think is the most telling is when a company has a high percentage of employee referrals!

So maybe the right questions are:

What percentage of your hires come through employee referrals?
What is the average tenure of your employees?
What do your people like most about the culture?
How can I get a better feel for what it will be like to work for your company?

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Work/Life Balance: Hindered or Enhanced by Technology?

When it rains it pours...yes, on occasion that is exactly what happens.

It never ceases to amaze me that when one thing goes wrong, another thing is right around the corner. In today's rapid world of communication and action its easy for your work and your personal time to have blurred lines. (Love that song btw)

This last week has been a doozy! I mean everything that could have gone wrong did. So, in hindsight I have to be thankful for technology. Because if it were not for my laptop, the internet, email, social media and wifi - I would not have been able to juggle, adapt and make good on my many commitments.

I also can't help but remember the earlier part of my career before I was uber-connected... before I slept next to an iPad and cell phone. Before I needed a charging station. Before I set up alerts in different sounds and managed my day by electronic calendar. Back then I used a Franklin Covey day planner, a tickler-file, a rolling file cabinet of resumes and an SIC code book for cold calling. I even had my head shot on my business card for branding... this was before LinkedIn. This should make me feel old, right? But I am only 34!

So, I ask you: Do you think that technology gave us more work/life balance or stole our work/life balance? I personally view it as an enhancer of balance, although I know and understand many feel the opposite. Technology will either help you (like me) juggle and maximize your entire day or it will hinder the quality of life balance. I like to work, socialize and think- in spurts. I like variety in my day. Some time to work - some time to play. But when the world comes at me fast and all things happen at once - technology seems to provide me with the opportunity to find balance in a lot of ways. It is probably because I don't compartmentalize... I try to go through my life taking what comes in a day and making time to be distracted. It's neither good nor bad, just how I do things.

What about you? Does technology hinder or enhance your work/life balance?

Friday, July 19, 2013

Cube Life


Cube Life: Those who spend 40+ hours working in a corporate, 4-walled, open–roofed workspace. This is also where you spend the majority of your waking hours. 
I was walking around the sales floor today and couldn’t help but notice all the cube decorations in everyone’s space. I swear some looked like artful masterpieces of sales and company-name puns on selling. People tacked up wrapping paper backgrounds, hung pictures and others clipped photos of the Officespace characters with open message bubbles. In passing conversation I found out about a 7ft. cardboard cutout bear and even threw out a suggested viking hat…because why not?!  I thought, you know what - when you are "dialing for dollars" in your cube… at least it’s something to look at. You can casually make work fun by swapping out some items each day. Of course we need to keep it clean and appropriate, but a 7ft teddy bear is hilarious and about as clean as you can get. I guess the top performer gets the bear in their cube as recognition. Cool idea - HR agrees.
This reminds me of a funny story…
When we first opened the office we had a consultant working with the leadership team. We were touring the office before closing on the lease and I said, “these are nice cubes!” His response was, “Don’t call them cubes, it’s bad for recruiting. Call them workspace.” Huh?? Seriously?
Well, let’s keep it real here... they are cubes! They also happen to be workspaces. These technicalities are made of ridiculousness. The fact of the matter is whether you call them workspaces or cubes, if your pipeline is backing out because of that…you have bigger problems! Like say... employment branding maybe?  He is not and never was a recruiter, but regardless how can one make a blanket statement like that? As if all people would be turned off from the word - cube. Businesses everywhere have office environments that are cubicle concept. I would Imagine our candidates even expect the job they are applying for requires them to work in a cubicle. So, let’s not paint a Zebra blue here… and just keep it real.
What fun things does your office do with their cubes? Any fun non-monetary sales reward ideas or experiences you would like to share?

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Toby couldn't handle the real stuff

It never fails to amaze me the drama we deal with in HR. Toby from The Office makes HR look bland, boring and dorky. A big joke of a profession. Like we are the push over, non-confrontation people-peacekeepers. Well... as funny is that is to watch for entertainment purposes, we are more like ping-pong people-jugglers with bouts of nail biting, research, planning and a ton of backbone (unlike our friend Toby). This profession is no joke, we do real things that affect bottom lines and sometimes peoples lives. 

But... after long days of "no joke"...we sure know how to have fun and make up for lost time!

Friday, July 12, 2013

~ Ode to Recruiting ~

The life of a recruiter is a life among mountains and valleys. Wins, losses, moments of redundancy and the occasional moments of pure dumbfounded-ness. I love every minute of it... I truly do. The chaos of high volume and the countless hours digging online. The intricate puzzle where company and talent dance. The spark of hope that this person will make an impact. The artful mixture of marketing, sales and people. The inspiration of a new leader and the building blocks of company culture. From purpose to frustration; I have dedicated over a decade to you. Thank you for finding me... because recruiting chose me and I chose to stay.

Never Super-Glue, Always Engagement

Employee Engagement - big words in the HR world. 

What are the benefits? Oh, let me count the ways...
  • Cut recruiting costs
  • Cut long term training costs
  • Increase productivity
  • Healthier workforce
  • Strong company culture
  • Pipeline for succession planning
  • Better customer experiences
You can see why these two words hold such importance in a company, however promoting, developing and enhancing engagement is not a simple thing and there are so many variables.
  • Compensation
  • Benefits
  • Management and Leadership
  • Corporate Culture
  • Learning and Development
  • Career Paths
  • Work/Life Balance Programs
and so on...

I personally feel that management is one of the more important variables in employee engagement strategy. I've worked for organizations that automatically look at recruiting as the culprit of poor retention. As if recruiting can influence an employees dissatisfaction in their job a year after hire... 

Yes, onboarding is a recruitment function that is vital to retention, but people quit and stay for a multitude of reasons. Some argue that quality of hire is where the buck stops. I find this funny, because in a past position I was hired to upgrade talent, so I did just that. A year later, I was refilling the same positions due to attrition. I can distinctively remember saying, "I can bring them in, but I can't manage and retain them too". 

In the exit interviews we would get a ton of feedback on why people decided to leave. 8 out of 10 times it was because of their manager. Now, I realize every organization is not one-size-fits-all and each organization experiences different struggles. I think in this particular company there was a clear arrow pointing to management style and corporate culture. Incidentally, this particular organization did not have a management development program which is an opportunity sorely missed in my opinion.

There is a great book by Kevin Sheridan called, " Building a Magnetic Culture"  . It's a quick read and covers the idea that engaged employees attract customers. I also read a recent Gallup report "Employee Engagement Insights for US Business Leaders", where they also indicate that engaged workforces attract and retain customers, thus improving the bottom line. 

Now I ask my readers - what do YOU think are the key items to effective employee engagement? Do you agree that engaged employees improve business bottom lines by attracting and retaining customers?

Now wouldn't life just be easier for us HR practitioners to use super-glue instead of  engagement strategy...Ha!

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Candidate Xperience


In my first post, I listed the candidate experience as one of the things that should be important to a Recruiter. This last week I had two examples of how this "Candidate Experience", at its basic element, is about being customer focused and your ability to build relationships - even if only for a week.
Case One: I referred my friend (let’s call him Ted for purposes of privacy) to a job posting by a professional acquaintance (Tiffany). Tiffany connects with Ted to discuss the details of the position and they move forward having Tiffany represent Ted for the role. During this process, Tiffany questions Ted’s integrity in his transparency of salary requirements. Ted takes offense because his integrity has never been questioned. In fact he is so adamant to prove his integrity, he is willing to prove himself through W2's and check stubs. While this is sometimes just part of the process; Tiffany back tracks realizing her delivery was poor and that she upset her candidate. Ted feels Tiffany does not have his best interest in mind, so he backs out of the process to interview for this job. Talk about LOSE/LOSE situation that could have been avoided!
Here’s the thing… if the recruiter had the candidates best interest in mind, as well as, her clients – she would not have approached the candidate in a way that was accusatory. If I were put in the same predicament as Tiffany, I would have asked the questions necessary for the client but also given the candidate the benefit of the doubt.
Suggestion: Emotional Intelligence is something that can be developed and it would have helped the recruiter with her delivery and her ability to understand her audience. Any business professional (HR or otherwise) should be developing their EQ quotient as it is a proven key indicator of success and even more so when your profession is with people! Daniel Goldman is a thought leader on this subject; you can follow him on LinkedIn!
Case Two: An old colleague (from a previous job) reached out to me. I maybe had 3 total interactions with him in 4 years, so it was a surprise to hear from him. He was looking for direction on his job search. I asked him, "why me"?  He said that all his past experiences with me were positive and he considered me trustworthy even though we were just barely acquainted. I was flattered to be chosen and happy to give him the direction he needed. I helped him narrow down the type of job he was looking for and the job titles he needed to search for. It felt good to give back - it was like chicken soup for my recruiter soul!
Here’s the thing….We should always treat the people we interact with respectfully and with a customer focus; no matter what their role or level. People remember when they have positive experiences and they are willing to be your internal and/or professional advocate. A sense of community is a huge advantage to a recruiter!
Suggestion: Give back what you know to others. You never know when that very person is helping you out in return. Karma is a beautiful thing!
In my opinion, The Candidate Experience is about being positive, helpful and focused on your customers’ satisfaction. In a Recruiters life, the customer is the hiring manager, the candidates (all in the pipeline) and the support professionals (inside your organization) that provide you the ability to successfully onboard a new hire. 
Look… I know we recruiters have large workloads and the whole life balance struggle.  However, I think the candidate experience also provides good recruiter karma! It not only proves your organization cares about your hire, but it helps before the hire with offer closing, networking/employee referrals and even helping an old colleague find a job. There is a great blog post on Smashfly about Candidate Experience, if your interested in a deeper dive, rather than my mumblings!
What examples do you have of The Candidate Experience either making or breaking the deal?